SANITY TRIAL
Hamlet v. Hamlet
Hamlet v. Hamlet
"Interrogatory No. 1: To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows
of outrageous fortune or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
and by opposing end them?
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows
of outrageous fortune or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
and by opposing end them?
Answer: Defendant objects to Interrogatory No. 1 on the ground
that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and not reasonably calculated
to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence to the extent it seeks to
answer one of life’s unanswerable metaphysical questions. Defendant
further objects on the ground that Int. No. 1 is too vague and ambiguous
to permit a meaningful response due to the variation in the type of slings
and arrows, and the unknown skill with which outrageous fortune may wield such."
that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and not reasonably calculated
to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence to the extent it seeks to
answer one of life’s unanswerable metaphysical questions. Defendant
further objects on the ground that Int. No. 1 is too vague and ambiguous
to permit a meaningful response due to the variation in the type of slings
and arrows, and the unknown skill with which outrageous fortune may wield such."
From here.
No comments:
Post a Comment